{"id":2045,"date":"2012-02-26T20:20:29","date_gmt":"2012-02-26T12:20:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wamath.sinaapp.com\/?p=2045"},"modified":"2012-02-26T20:20:29","modified_gmt":"2012-02-26T12:20:29","slug":"review-of-the-rham-cohomology-theory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lttt.vanabel.cn\/?p=2045","title":{"rendered":"Review of the Rham Cohomology Theory"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Let $M$ be a smooth closed (i.e., compact and without boundary) manifold. Let $TM$ and $T^\\ast M$ denote the tangent and cotangent (vector) bundle of $M$, respectively. Denote $\\Lambda^\\cdot(T^\\ast M)$ the complex exterior algebra bundle of $T^\\ast M$ and $\\Omega^\\cdot(M,\\C)=\\Gamma(\\Lambda^\\cdot(T^\\ast M))$ be the space of smooth sections of $\\Lambda^\\cdot(T^\\ast M)$. Particularly, for any integer $p$ with $0\\leq p\\leq n=\\dim M$, we denote by<br \/>\n\\[<br \/>\n\\Omega^p(M)=\\Gamma(\\Lambda^p(T^\\ast M))<br \/>\n\\]<br \/>\nbe the space of smooth $p$-forms over $M$.<br \/>\n<!--more-->\u00a0<br \/>\nBetween the $\\Omega^\\cdot(M,\\C)$, we have an operator $\\rm d$, i.e., the exterior differential operator, which maps a $p$-form to a $p+1$-form and with the property $\\rm d^2=0$. Then, we obtain a complex chain $(\\Omega^\\cdot(M,\\C),\\rd)$<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/i.imgur.com\/Thla1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/i.imgur.com\/Thla1.png\" title=\"de Rham complex chain\" class=\"aligncenter\" width=\"724\" height=\"41\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nDefine the $p$-th (complex coefficient) \\emph{de Rham cohomology} of $M$ as<br \/>\n\\[<br \/>\nH^p_{dR}(M,\\C)=\\frac{\\ker\\rd|_{\\Omega^p(M,\\C)}}<br \/>\n{\\rd(\\Omega^{p-1}(M,\\C))},<br \/>\n\\]<br \/>\nand the \\emph{total de Rham cohomology} of $M$ as<br \/>\n\\[<br \/>\nH^\\ast_{dR}(M;\\C)=\\bigoplus_{p=0}^{\\dim M}H_{dR}^p(M;\\C).<br \/>\n\\]<br \/>\nParticularly, a form $\\omega$ is called \\emph{closed} if $\\rd\\omega=0$; called \\emph{exact} if there exists an $\\eta$ such that $\\rd\\eta=\\omega$.<br \/>\n\\begin{excs}<br \/>\n  For general $p$ the $p$-th de Rham cohomology may be hard to compute, but prove the following two special cases<br \/>\n   \\begin{itemize}<br \/>\n   \\item $H_{dR}^0(M;\\C)$ can be written as the direct sum of $\\C$ with multiplicity be its connected components, i.e.,<br \/>\n       \\[<br \/>\n        H_{dR}^0(M;\\C)=\\bigoplus_{\\textrm{connected components}}\\C.<br \/>\n       \\]<br \/>\n   \\item Suppose that $M$ be connected, and define an functional<br \/>\n       \\[<br \/>\n       \\int_M\\mathpunct{:}\\Omega^n(M;\\C)\\to\\C,<br \/>\n       \\]<br \/>\n       by $\\omega\\to\\int_M\\omega$, then prove that<br \/>\n       \\[<br \/>\n       \\ker\\int_M=\\rd(\\Omega^{n-1}(M;\\C)),<br \/>\n       \\]<br \/>\n       from which we can compute the $n$-th de Rham cohomology $H_{dR}^n(M;\\C)$. (cf. \\cite{bott1982differential})<br \/>\n  \\end{itemize}<br \/>\n\\end{excs}<br \/>\nApparently $H_{dR}^\\ast(M;\\C)$ is a vector space, since for any $\\omega$, $\\omega&#8217;\\in\\Omega^\\ast(M;\\C)$ (maybe one is $k$ form and other is $k&#8217;$ form), then we can verify the following equation holds<br \/>\n\\[<br \/>\n[a\\omega]=a[\\omega],\\quad[\\omega+\\omega&#8217;]=[\\omega]+[\\omega&#8217;],<br \/>\n\\]<br \/>\nwhere $a$ is a constant function on $M$. With a litter more effort, we can prove that $H_{dR}^\\ast(M;\\C)$ is a ring. In fact, define<br \/>\n\\[<br \/>\n[\\omega]\\wedge[\\omega&#8217;]=[\\omega\\wedge\\omega&#8217;],<br \/>\n\\]<br \/>\nthen for any two differential forms $\\eta,\\eta&#8217;$ on $M$, we have (note that $\\rd\\omega=0=\\rd\\omega&#8217;$)<br \/>\n\\begin{align*}<br \/>\n(\\omega+\\rd\\eta)\\wedge(\\omega&#8217;+\\rd\\eta&#8217;)<br \/>\n&#038;=\\omega\\wedge\\omega&#8217;+\\omega\\wedge\\rd\\eta&#8217;<br \/>\n+\\rd\\eta\\wedge\\omega&#8217;+\\rd\\eta\\wedge\\rd\\eta&#8217;\\\\<br \/>\n&#038;=\\omega\\wedge\\omega&#8217;+\\rd((-1)^{|\\omega|}\\omega\\wedge\\eta&#8217;<br \/>\n+\\eta\\wedge\\omega&#8217;+\\eta\\wedge\\rd\\eta&#8217;),<br \/>\n\\end{align*}<br \/>\nwhich means<br \/>\n\\[<br \/>\n[\\omega]\\wedge[\\omega&#8217;]=[\\omega\\wedge\\omega&#8217;].<br \/>\n\\]<br \/>\nMoreover, $H^\\ast_{dR}(M;\\C)$ is \\emph{superexchange}, i.e.,<br \/>\n\\[<br \/>\n[\\omega]\\wedge[\\eta]<br \/>\n=(-1)^{|\\omega|\\cdot|\\eta|}[\\eta]\\wedge[\\omega].<br \/>\n\\]<\/p>\n<p>When $\\dim M=n=4m$, consider $H_{dR}^{2m}(M;\\C)$, then for any $[\\omega]$, $[\\eta]\\in H_{dR}^{2m}(M;\\C)$ we have<br \/>\n\\[<br \/>\n[\\omega]\\wedge[\\eta]=[\\eta]\\wedge[\\omega].<br \/>\n\\]<br \/>\nDefine a bi-linear operator $< \\cdot,\\cdot>$ on $H_{dR}^{2m}(M;\\C)$ as<br \/>\n\\[<br \/>\n< [\\omega],[\\eta]>=\\int_M\\omega\\wedge\\eta.<br \/>\n\\]<br \/>\nwe can prove that $< \\cdot,\\cdot>$ is a non-singular quadric on $H_{dR}^{2m}(M;\\C)$ and its signature is a topological invariants, called the \\emph{characteristic number} of $M$.<\/p>\n<p>Now, we state the \\emph{de Rham theory} without proof (for the proof cf. \\cite{bott1982differential}).<br \/>\n\\begin{thm}<br \/>\n  If $M$ is a smooth closed orientable manifold, then for any integer $p$ with $0\\leq p\\leq\\dim M$, we have<br \/>\n  \\begin{enumerate}<br \/>\n    \\item $\\dim H_{dR}^p(M;\\C)<+\\infty$;\n    \\item $H_{dR}^p(M;\\C)$ is canonically isomorphic to $H^p_{sing}(M;\\C)$, the $p$-th singular cohomology of $M$.\n  \\end{enumerate}\n\\end{thm}\n\\begin{rem}\n  The above Theorem shows that \\emph{algebraic topology} can be represented by \\emph{differential forms}, and \\emph{Chern-Weil} theory claims that the characteristic classes of vector bundle (which is a cohomology class) can be represented by \\emph{de Rham cohomology class}.\n\\end{rem}\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Let $M$ be a smooth closed (i.e., compac &hellip;<\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more\"> <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/lttt.vanabel.cn\/?p=2045\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Review of the Rham Cohomology Theory<\/span> \u9605\u8bfb\u66f4\u591a &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[247,350],"class_list":["post-2045","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-index-theory","tag-characteristic-classes","tag-de-rham-cohomology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lttt.vanabel.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2045","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lttt.vanabel.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lttt.vanabel.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lttt.vanabel.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lttt.vanabel.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2045"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lttt.vanabel.cn\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2045\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lttt.vanabel.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lttt.vanabel.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2045"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lttt.vanabel.cn\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}