Let M be a smooth closed (i.e., compact and without boundary) manifold. Let TM and T∗M denote the tangent and cotangent (vector) bundle of M, respectively. Denote Λ⋅(T∗M) the complex exterior algebra bundle of T∗M and Ω⋅(M,C)=Γ(Λ⋅(T∗M)) be the space of smooth sections of Λ⋅(T∗M). Particularly, for any integer p with 0≤p≤n=dimM, we denote by
Ωp(M)=Γ(Λp(T∗M))
be the space of smooth p-forms over M.
Between the Ω⋅(M,C), we have an operator d, i.e., the exterior differential operator, which maps a p-form to a p+1-form and with the property d2=0. Then, we obtain a complex chain (Ω⋅(M,C),d)

Define the p-th (complex coefficient) de Rham cohomology of M as
HpdR(M,C)=kerd|Ωp(M,C)d(Ωp−1(M,C)),
and the total de Rham cohomology of M as
H∗dR(M;C)=dimM⨁p=0HpdR(M;C).
Particularly, a form ω is called closed if dω=0; called exact if there exists an η such that dη=ω.
- H0dR(M;C) can be written as the direct sum of C with multiplicity be its connected components, i.e.,
H0dR(M;C)=⨁connected componentsC.
- Suppose that M be connected, and define an functional
∫M:Ωn(M;C)→C,
by ω→∫Mω, then prove that
ker∫M=d(Ωn−1(M;C)),
from which we can compute the n-th de Rham cohomology HndR(M;C). (cf. [1])
Apparently H∗dR(M;C) is a vector space, since for any ω, ω′∈Ω∗(M;C) (maybe one is k form and other is k′ form), then we can verify the following equation holds
[aω]=a[ω],[ω+ω′]=[ω]+[ω′],
where a is a constant function on M. With a litter more effort, we can prove that H∗dR(M;C) is a ring. In fact, define
[ω]∧[ω′]=[ω∧ω′],
then for any two differential forms η,η′ on M, we have (note that dω=0=dω′)
(ω+dη)∧(ω′+dη′)=ω∧ω′+ω∧dη′+dη∧ω′+dη∧dη′=ω∧ω′+d((−1)|ω|ω∧η′+η∧ω′+η∧dη′),
which means
[ω]∧[ω′]=[ω∧ω′].
Moreover, H∗dR(M;C) is superexchange, i.e.,
[ω]∧[η]=(−1)|ω|⋅|η|[η]∧[ω].
When dimM=n=4m, consider H2mdR(M;C), then for any [ω], [η]∈H2mdR(M;C) we have
[ω]∧[η]=[η]∧[ω].
Define a bi-linear operator <⋅,⋅> on H2mdR(M;C) as
<[ω],[η]>=∫Mω∧η.
we can prove that <⋅,⋅> is a non-singular quadric on H2mdR(M;C) and its signature is a topological invariants, called the characteristic number of M.
Now, we state the de Rham theory without proof (for the proof cf. [1]).
- dimHpdR(M;C)<+∞;
- HpdR(M;C) is canonically isomorphic to Hpsing(M;C), the p-th singular cohomology of M.
发表回复