Suppose Ω⊂Rn and donote W1,p:=W1,p(Ω) be the sobolev space for some 1<p<+∞. Recall that fi∈W1,p convergent weakly to f∈W1,p, if for any ϕ in the dual space of W1,p, we have ⟨fi,ϕ⟩→⟨f,ϕ⟩, denote as fi⇀f. This is distinguished by strongly convergence, as we use the dual normal instead of W1,p normal.
Proposition 1. If fi⇀f in W1,p, then fi→f in Lp.
Proof . Since W1,p is a Banach space, and fi⇀f, then fi is uniformly bounded in W1,p by Banach-Steinhaus Theorem. Since W1,p is compactly embedding into Lp, we have, by passing to subsequence, fi→g in Lp for some g∈Lp.
For any ϕ∈C∞0, define a Tϕ as
Tϕ(f):=∫Ωfϕ,∀f∈W1,p,
then Tϕ∈(W1,p)′, i.e., in the dual space of W1,p. Thus, by weakly convergence, we have
Tϕ(fi)→Tϕ(f)⟺∫Ωfiϕ→∫Ωfϕ.
On the other hand, fi→g strongly in Lp, thus by Holder inequality, we have
∫Ωfiϕ→∫Ωgϕ.
In conclusion, we have
∫Ωfϕ=∫Ωgϕ,
and we finish the argument by the density of C∞0 in Lp.
For any ϕ∈C∞0, define a Tϕ as
Tϕ(f):=∫Ωfϕ,∀f∈W1,p,
then Tϕ∈(W1,p)′, i.e., in the dual space of W1,p. Thus, by weakly convergence, we have
Tϕ(fi)→Tϕ(f)⟺∫Ωfiϕ→∫Ωfϕ.
On the other hand, fi→g strongly in Lp, thus by Holder inequality, we have
∫Ωfiϕ→∫Ωgϕ.
In conclusion, we have
∫Ωfϕ=∫Ωgϕ,
and we finish the argument by the density of C∞0 in Lp.
本作品采用创作共用版权协议, 要求署名、非商业用途和保持一致. 转载本站内容必须也遵循署名-非商业用途-保持一致的创作共用协议.
发表回复